Please include
Israel's captive soldiers in your tefillot: Zecharia Shlomo ben
Miriam Baumel, Tzvi ben Penina Feldman, Yekutiel Yehuda Nachman ben Sarah
Katz, Ron ben Batya Arad, Guy ben Rina Chever.
Thursday Isru Chag, 7 Sivan 5774 � June 5, 2014
The Torah in Parashat Behaalotekha tells of the
korban pesach offering brought by
Benei Yisrael a year after the Exodus from Egypt, and of the group of
temei�im � people who were ritually
impure and thus unable to participate in the sacrifice. They approached Moshe to ask if they
could offer the paschal sacrifice, and God informed Moshe that people who are
tamei on Pesach and thus unable to offer the korban
pesach should do so one
month later, on the 14th of Iyar (Pesach Sheni).
The Sifrei, as well as the Gemara (Sukka 25), cites different
views among the Tanna�im as to the identity of these people. Rabbi Akiva identified the
temei�im as Mishael and Eltzafan, Moshe�s cousins who removed the remains of
Nadav and Avihu after they were consumed by fire in the Mishkan on the
day of its inauguration. Another
view is taken by Rabbi Yishmael, who claimed that these people were assigned the
task of transporting Yosef�s remains through the wilderness. Rabbi Yitzchak, however, dismisses
both views, noting that all these people could have completed the seven-day
purification process in time for the korban pesach offering. The people who approached Moshe must
have become temei�im within seven days of the sacrifice, and thus Rabbi
Yitzchak maintained that they had tended to a meit mitzva � a deceased
person with no family members to bury him � and were not able to complete their
purification before Pesach.
Seemingly, these Tanna�im debate the question of whether one who had the opportunity to regain his status of
purity before Pesach but failed to do so is entitled to offer the paschal
sacrifice on Pesach Sheni. Rabbi
Yitzchak rejected the views of Rabbi Akiva and Rabbi Yishmael because the people
they named would have been able to offer the sacrifice had they undergone the
purification process in time. Hence,
they would not deserve the opportunity presented by Pesach Sheni. According to Rabbi Yitzchak, then,
one may offer the korban on
Pesach Sheni only if he did not have
the opportunity to become tahor before Pesach. Rabbi Yishmael and Rabbi Akiva
apparently disagreed, and maintained that anybody who was
tamei on Pesach, even if this was
because he neglected to become tahor in time, is given the opportunity
offer the sacrifice on Pesach Sheni.
(This point is made by Rabbi Chaim Jachter
in an article in
Hadarom, 5765.)
In truth, however, one might distinguish in this regard between Rabbi
Akiva and Rabbi Yishmael. According
to Rabbi Yishmael, these people were the ones transporting Yosef�s coffin, and
as the nation had been encamped in Sinai for ten months, it stands to reason
that these men had no contact with the coffin during this period, and thus had
ample opportunity to become
tahor but failed to do so. Accordingly, it
would certainly appear that Rabbi Yishmael allows one to offer the sacrifice on
Pesach Sheni even if it was negligence that caused him to be unfit for offering
the sacrifice on Pesach. Rabbi
Akiva�s view, however, might be explained differently. Malbim (both here in Parashat
Behaalotekha and in the beginning of Parashat Shemini) writes that Rabbi Akiva
and Rabbi Yitzchak�s debate may be understood as a question concerning the
chronology of events. Most
commentators maintain that the seven-day
milu�im process, whereby the
Mishkan was formally consecrated, took place during the
final week of Adar, and the eighth day, when Aharon and his sons began serving
as
kohanim, was Rosh Chodesh Nissan. It was on
this day when Nadav and Avihu died, and thus Mishael and Eltzafan became
temei�im on Rosh Chodesh
Nissan. Hence, according to Rabbi
Yitzchak, they had ample time to regain their status of purity before Pesach
(the 14th of Nissan), and would not have been given the opportunity
to offer the sacrifice on Pesach Sheni.
Ibn Ezra (beginning of Parashat Shemini), however, maintained that the
milu�im process began on Rosh Chodesh Nissan.
In his view, Nadav and Avihu perished not on the first of Nissan, but
rather on the eighth of Nissan.
Malbim suggests that this was the position taken by Rabbi Akiva. Mishael and Eltzafan, according to
this view, became temei�im on the eighth of Nissan, and did not regain
their status of purity until a week later � the night of the 15th of
Nissan. Since they were still
ritually impure at the time of the slaughtering of the korban on the
afternoon of the 14th of Nissan, they could not participate in the
sacrifice.
If so, then Rabbi Akiva accepts the premise that only those who did not
have the opportunity to become tahor before Pesach are allowed to bring
the offering on Pesach Sheni. His
disagreement with Rabbi Yitzchak concerns the chronology of events, as in his
view, Mishael and Eltzafan were not able to regain their status of purity before
Pesach.
Rav David Silverberg |
THE
COMPLETE SALT ARCHIVES CAN BE FOUND AT: www.vbm-torah.org/salt-archives.html (c) 2014 Israel Koschitzky Virtual Beit Midrash, Yeshivat Har Etzion.
|
|
Come study in the VIRTUAL BEIT
MIDRASH - Torah by email