▪ Prominent Conservative rabbi: When Your Rabbi Comes Out as Gay
▪ New Information Revealed About Ultra-Orthodox Plane Scandal
▪ Is the Rarest Artifact from King Solomon’s Temple Really a Forgery?
▪ How To Beaver Your Way To an Award-Winning Sukkah in Oregon
▪ It’s a tough time for brick and mortar: Hard Times for the Upper West Side’s Venerable West Side Judaica
▪ Medieval manuscripts and online reading: How Google is Destroying the Act of Reading
▪ Only a retired tech millionaire would think that a Shmita Sabbatical is feasible for a business: The ‘Shmita,’ or Sabbatical Year, Is Here Again. How Can Our Economy Learn From It?
▪ Going to the authorities isn’t all that it was claimed to be. Sometimes you just need to pray for the wrath of God: The Orthodox Sex Abuse Crackdown That Wasn’t
▪ Some of these issues are Catholic-specific and some are universal to all conservative religions: How should the Church care for same-sex attracted people?
▪ The substance of Hasidic style (video)
▪ Confused by Charity? There’s a Guide for That
3 comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Have to wonder if the rabbi appreciated the irony of “Rabbah said, any scholar whose inside does not match his outside is no scholar. Abaye, and some say Ravah bar Ulah, said [one whose inside does not match his outside] is called an abomination.”
Going to the authorities isn’t what it should because some people have them in their pocket. Only Federal investigation, which is insulated from political forces, has a chance of cleaning up the sex abuse cover-ups that are rampant.
The story on how “Google is Destroying the Act of Reading” reminds me of Rav Schachter’s criticism of the use of Bar Ilan for paskening in the tefillin/partnership minyan controversy. One might be able to find the “key words” but the issue gets reduced to those few words instead of having an appreciation for the context around the daf and in Shas in general.