Latest EssaysLegacy

Internet and Leading Services

Can someone with an internet connection in his home lead synagogue services? Of course, if you believe–as I do–that an internet connection is a wonderful thing to have then the answer is clearly yes. However, If you take seriously all the extreme, and at times contradictory (even from the same rabbi), rulings regarding internet usage that have been reported in the media, I think we can look at a relevant historical responsum to answer this question. This is useful both in examining the current situation and in seeing how far exaggerated rhetoric can be taken with real-life repercussions. (I am reminded of a devout elderly man I used to know who was prevented by his chassidic family from leading the minyan while sitting shivah for his sister because he was clean-shaven.)

In a 1971 responsum, R. Moshe Stern discussed whether someone with a television can lead synagogue services (Be’er Moshe, vol. 4 no. 143). R. Stern assumes that watching television is a violation of a biblical prohibition. Additionally, since people can see the antenna on the owner’s house, the sin is considered as if committed publicly. Often, guests to a home can even see the television set. Therefore, such a person is a public sinner and may not lead synagogue services. You should prefer praying alone at home to a synagogue where he leads. You must also avoid hearing a sermon given by a “rabbi” who owns a television.

Since internet use is private, unless you blog under your real name, presumably R. Stern would allow someone to lead services even if he has unfiltered internet access as long as he does not publicize the fact.

Gil Student

Rabbi Gil Student is the Editor of TorahMusings.com, a leading website on Orthodox Jewish scholarly subjects, and Director of the Halacha Commission of the Rabbinical Alliance of America. He writes a popular column on issues of Jewish law and thought featured in newspapers and magazines, including the Orthodox Union’s Jewish Action magazine, The Jewish Link, The Jewish Echo and The Jewish Vues. In the past, he has served as the President of the small Jewish publisher Yashar Books and as the Managing Editor of OU Press. Rabbi Student currently is serving his third term on the Executive Committee of the Rabbinical Council of America. He serves on the Editorial Board of Jewish Action magazine and the Board of OU Press. He has published five English books, the most recent titled Articles of Faith: Traditional Jewish Belief in the Internet Era, previously served as the Book Editor of Jewish Action magazine, and served as the American editor for Morasha Kehillat Yaakov: Essays in Honour of Chief Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks.

21 Comments

  1. When I read “Can someone with an internet connection in his home lead synagogue services?” I assumed the question was about being a chazzan from home!

  2. “They told me I couldn’t lead the davening after i sang Aleynu to the tune of The Flintstones. Now I know why.”

    and how did they recognize the tune of The Flinstones?

  3. Why is blogging with one’s real name considered “in public”? It cannot be considered in public unless other Bnei Torah know about it (kiddush/chillul hashem requires ten Jews), but this is not the case in this situation because Bnei Torah never use the Internet so they would never know and thus it would not be in public.

  4. but this is not the case in this situation because Bnei Torah never use the Internet so they would never know

    Somebody at the internet filter company has to search the internet for pornography, kefira, and other things to add to the blacklist…

  5. According to the reasoning of R’ Stern, today when we no longer have roof antenna – someone who watches TV in the privacy of their home – most especially in a room where outsiders don’t enter for example a bedroom – shouldn’t be considered a public sinner

  6. if the ppl in the shul object, then they can set their own rules. if the shul is a “private” shul owned by one individ, he sets the rules. (i dont mean from a practical view, i mean from a halachic point of view.)

    the only occupational related objection to baal tfillah is MB saying a (litigating, vs transaction) attorney cannot be a shliach tzibur.

  7. Funny, it took me a few sentences as well to realize they were not talking about using the internet as really cool microphone, but rather just a person who happens to own internet access.

    Reminds me of the picture going around that says “If you have a phone with internet with facebook and twitter, but no filter, you can’t make coffee” 😛 (pun on the word filter)

  8. ” from leading the minyan while sitting shivah for his sister because he was clean-shaven.”

    i remember attending a pesach hotel program, and the (prominent litvish RY who happens to have a college degree to “please mommy”) declined to count me and others for a minyan cause we dont wear a hat. (his weekly parsha column is listed on all the usual internet sites.) of course, i promptly left for another minyan. i guess thats why he had a private minyan. not to associate with us riff raff. also, a private dining room for all meals, not just the seder.

Leave a Reply

Back to top button