Toward a Wiser Use of Energy

 

Guest post by Rabbi Yonatan Neril

Published in conjunction with Canfei Nesharim. This material was produced as part of the Jewcology project. Jewcology.com is a new web portal for the global Jewish environmental community. Thanks to the ROI community for their generous support, which made the Jewcology project possible.

Rabbi Yonatan Neril is founder and director of Jewish Eco Seminars, which engages and educates the Jewish community with Jewish environmental wisdom. He has worked with Canfei Nesharim for the past six years in developing educational resources relating to Judaism and the environment.

The author would like to thank Evonne Marzouk for her helpful comments in developing this article.

One of the most significant sustainability challenges of our time is how we produce, use, and relate to energy. Prior to the industrial revolution, the most important sources of energy for human uses were animals, people, wood, wind, and water. This changed with the invention of the steam turbine, internal combustion engine, and jet engine, and the use of fossil fuels like coal, oil and gas and of nuclear power. While these technologies greatly increased material standards of living among human societies, they also have driven significant environmental changes which are beginning to have noticeable impacts worldwide, including climate change, the BP oil spill, and Japan’s nuclear crisis. What can we learn from the Jewish tradition about how to use energy responsibly?

Use Energy Wisely

The Jewish tradition teaches us to use energy wisely. In some cases, wasting energy is a violation of Bal Tashchit, the prohibition not to waste excessively.[1] For example, the Talmudic Sage Mar Zutra stated, “One who covers an oil lamp [causing the flame to burn inefficiently] or uncovers a kerosene lamp [allowing the fuel to evaporate faster] violates the prohibition of Bal Tashchit.”[2]

Based on this teaching of the Talmud, the Ben Ish Chai (Rabbi Yosef Chaim ben Eliyahu), a major halakhic authority of 19th century Iraq, addressed a related case in which a person lit two wicks in oil for use at night. The person left both wicks lit throughout the night in the event they woke up in the middle of the night and needed to see. In order to prevent waste, the Ben Ish Chai instructed the person to extinguish one wick before going to bed, since were they to get up they would only need the minimal light of one wick and keeping the second wick lit would be a transgression of Bal Tashchit, the prohibition not to destroy or waste.[3] This halakhic responsa shows a high degree of concern for the wasting of energy and the unnecessary use of oil, in a case where a person does not derive benefit from the additional use of energy.

Similarly, the Ben Ish Chai discusses a case in which a person puts a large amount of oil before Shabbat in a lamp in their home in order for it to remain lit for all of Shabbat. He rejects this practice as a waste of oil and a transgression of Bal Tashchit, since the light from this lamp will not be of benefit to a person during the day in their sun-lit home.

In our time, this responsa may be relevant concerning leaving lights, heaters, air conditioners, or other appliances running for all of Shabbat or during the week when a person will not derive benefit from them. Doing so for a significant portion of the time may be considered a violation of Bal Tashchit.

Another area where this may apply is in ‘standby’ appliance use in most homes. According to the Energy Analysis Department of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, “A surprisingly large number of electrical products—TVs to microwave ovens to air conditioners—cannot be switched off completely without being unplugged. These products draw power 24 hours a day, often without the knowledge of the consumer. A typical American home has forty products constantly drawing power. Together these amount to almost 10% of residential electricity use.”[4]

If the Ben Ish Chai was concerned about the unnecessary use of one wick in an oil lamp, how much the more so should we be concerned about dozens of appliances that quietly, constantly use energy without benefiting the user?

For Our Health

Modern energy use causes pervasive air pollution in most of the major cities in the world. The pollution comes from many sources, including motor vehicles, industrial factories, and power plants that produce electricity for lighting and appliances at homes and offices. Studies show a correlation between air pollution and premature deaths due to lung cancer. Researchers conclude that when air pollution in a city declines, the city benefits with a directly proportional drop in death rates.[5] According to 2008 estimates from the World Health Organization, “air pollution is a major environmental risk to health and is estimated to cause approximately two million premature deaths worldwide per year.”[6] A joint Israeli-US study found that more people die in Israel from air pollution than from traffic accidents (which is also more than who die from terrorist attacks).[7] Researchers also note that air pollution can trigger depression, anxiety and anger in some people.[8]

How does Jewish tradition recognize the importance of protecting our health from the impacts of air pollution? One example involves the Mishnah stating that tanneries, which produce noxious odors, must be sufficiently distanced from human settlements so as not to negatively affect people in the vicinity.[9] Rabbi Ezra Batzri, former head of the Sephardi Rabbinical Court in Jerusalem, writes that causing harmful forms of pollution to others is “not to be considered as inconsequential. [Rather] they are matters of Jewish law that stand up at the heights of the world.” He notes therefore that a character trait of a righteous person (Midat Hasidut) is being careful about not damaging others even indirectly.[10]

By using less energy, we can reduce the amount of coal and gasoline burned, and reduce the health impacts from the resultant air pollution. Given the significant damages to human health, it would seem that the unnecessary or wasteful use of energy goes against rabbinic advice concerning not damaging other people.[11]

Green is Clean: Keeping Cities Beautiful and the Air Clear

Keeping cities beautiful is not only a modern challenge– in Talmudic times, the Sages enacted legislation to maintain the beauty of the cities of the land of Israel. The Mishnah states that trees had to be distanced from city walls, which according to the Talmudic sage Ulah was to preserve the beauty of the city.[12] This source indicates how maintaining a city’s beauty is a significant concern in the Jewish tradition. The Talmud discusses how large ovens were not allowed in Jerusalem, lest the smoke from the ovens blacken the walls of the Holy City and make it less beautiful.[13] Furthermore, the Mishnah prohibited using olive wood, grapevines and fruit-bearing fig trees and date palms for burning in the Temple in Jerusalem, which according to some rabbinic views was because they produced excessive smoke.[14] Jerusalem had the highest level of sanctity of all cities in the Land of Israel, and which required that its physical beauty, including air quality, be preserved.

Within its walls, G-d commanded the priests to raise up a pleasing aroma through the burning of incense at the Temple in Jerusalem.[15] The Talmudic sage Rabba bar bar Chana taught that the pleasant smell of the incense reached all the way to Jericho, over ten miles away. The air was so fragrant that women did not need to put on perfume. In Jerusalem, the smell of incense was so strong that a bride, known for wearing strong perfume, would not need to put any on.[16] This Talmudic teaching conveys that pleasant fragrance was the dominant smell in Jerusalem, stronger than anything else that was put into the air.

In our times, Jerusalem is blessed with the pleasing smell of many bakeries and flower shops. Yet many thoroughfares also smell of air pollution, due to exhaust fumes of carbon monoxide, sulphur dioxide, and other not-so-pleasing air pollutants. In 2007, Jerusalem experienced 33 high air pollution days, due in large part to the personal and industrial energy use of its 750,000 inhabitants.[17] Beyond Jerusalem, a thick layer of smog often hangs over the coastal plain of Israel from Ashkelon to Netanya and blemishes the beauty of the land of Israel.

While the rabbinic laws to preserve the beauty of Jerusalem and Israel’s cities are for the most part not in force today, we would be wise to consider their wisdom for our current situation. By reducing and cleaning our energy use, we can preserve the sanctity of our holiest city and the land of Israel. These lessons can also lend wisdom for the health and beauty of cities outside of Israel.[18]

Shabbat, Fire, and Energy

When we speak about human energy use today, we are primarily speaking about our use of fire. Fire is the paradigmatic technology, which human beings use to master the world. Fire enabled metallurgy, the shaping of mineral ores into tools, which over human history have become more and more advanced. Today we have a lot of machines which rely on fire: internal combustion engines in our cars, power plants that produce electricity, and lights and appliances in our homes and offices that run on electricity. The tremendous wealth of modern society stems from the use of industrial technology powered by fossil fuels that have been ignited by fire.

Rabeinu Bachya (Spain, 1255-1340) teaches that “Fire, i.e. light, was the first of the activities G’d engaged in when creating the universe.”[19] He also notes that “Making fire is an appropriate example of basic human activity seeing that most of the principal activities we are engaged in cannot be performed satisfactorily if one were not able or allowed to make fire.” For six days we are supposed to properly use fire, which represents human mastery over the world.

The Torah teaches, “You shall not kindle fire in any of your dwelling places on the Sabbath day.”[20] On Shabbat, we are instructed to refrain from using fire, demonstrating that true mastery belongs to G-d alone. As Rabbi Sampson Raphael Hirsch teaches, “…the ability to produce fire artificially is just that which first gave Man his true mastery over the materials of the world. Only by means of fire can he create his tools.”[21] Rabbi Hirsch explains, “On Sabbath the cessation of work is the belief and acknowledgment that the ability to ‘master matter,’ the creative productive power that Man has, is lent to him by God, and is only to be used in His service.” [22]

We mark the entrance and exit of Sabbath by lighting candles, and on the seventh day itself rest from using fire. Shabbat is the prime way that a Jew is supposed to learn balance in how to use fire, and by extension, energy and technology. According to traditional Shabbat observance, there is rest from cars and computers, Blackberries and cell-phones, stereo music, trains, and alarms.[23] By bringing some of this rest into our world today, we can reduce the amount of energy we need and also help us put ourselves in correct relationship with our use of energy.[24]

Global Impacts

Fossil fuels power our industrial society, and this energy use has significant impacts, including global climate change. A typical American household consumes over 12,000 kilowatt-hours of electricity per year. Each kilowatt-hour of electricity from a coal-fired power plant releases over two pounds (nearly 1 kilo) of carbon dioxide (CO2).[25] Per capita energy consumption in Israel, while below that of the US, is on the rise. Burning wood, coal, and oil lets off carbon dioxide. Carbon is stored in these fuel sources, and through the combustion process of fire, carbon connects with oxygen from the air to form CO2.[26] This CO2, along with other ‘greenhouse gases,’ is contributing to global changes in the earth’s climate. Burning fossil fuels is heating the planet, melting the ice caps, raising the sea level, and making forest fires more common.

A consensus of international scientists—i.e. the mainstream in science– state that human-caused global climate change is likely to bring on more severe heat waves, storms, floods, and droughts, with major impacts on human societies.[27] A 2011 major study “directly links rising greenhouse-gas levels with the growing intensity of rain and snow in the Northern Hemisphere,” adversely impacting hundreds of millions of people.[28] Leading climatologists stated “with a high degree of confidence” that the extreme heat waves like those that occurred in Texas and Oklahoma in 2011 and Moscow in 2010 “were a consequence of global warming.”[29] In Hurricane Sandy of 2012, a number of scientists partially attribute to climate change the strength of the storm surge that caused widespread destruction in New Jersey and New York.[30]

Toward Sustainable Energy Use

One way we can reduce the impacts of our use of fire is to use more renewable energy. In 1981, the Lubavitcher Rebbe made a call to significantly increase the use of solar energy in the United States. He said, “Very soon, the entire country should switch, first of all, to energy that can be generated from the sun’s rays in the [US] south, which should be supplied to the entire country.”[31] His call to use renewable energy is relevant today more than ever. Solar energy utilizes fire in a different way, by making use of the tremendous energy reaching the earth from the fire that is the sun. For example, solar water heaters harness the sun’s rays to heat water and thus reduce electricity demand. The Good Energy Initiative works to provide financial incentives to poorer families in Israel to use solar water heaters instead of conventional heaters that rely on burning fossil fuels.[32]

An individual might say to him or herself: ‘But I am just one person—my consumption has a negligible effect on the global climate. There are 6.9 billion people in the world[33] and 10.5 million people in Israel—my using energy wisely won’t make a difference!’ This way of thinking goes against the advice of the Sages, who said that a person needs to act as if the entire world was created for them.[34]

An individual can make a difference by using less energy, i.e., by driving less, eating less meat or globalized food, or taking fewer plane trips. It is in this realm of personal consumption that Jewish thought may best inform our energy and climate challenges today and empower us to change. Bal Tashchit of energy, protecting the health of our neighbors, maintaining the beauty of cities, and not making fire on Sabbath all have in common the restraint of individuals to achieve a higher purpose. These teachings instruct us about prudent, conscious, and elevated use of energy. Energy is a precious resource that must be used wisely. If not, its misuse has serious consequences for people and the planet.

The prophet Isaiah repeatedly calls on the Jewish people to be a “light unto the nations.”[35] Rabbi David Kimchi explains that ‘light’ here refers to the Torah.[36] In our times, let us find inspiration and light in the profound teachings of our tradition that address our central challenges. And let the light that emerges from our example reveal to the world a new sustainable path.


[1] For more on this topic, see the Jewcology resources on Bal Tashchit.
[2] Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Shabbat 67b. Translation by Dr. Akiva Wolff based on commentary of Rashi. Rabbi Moshe Yitzhak Forehand, in Bircat Hashem p. 144, comments on the statement of Mar Zutra that the person’s action is considered ‘in a destructive manner’ since a person does not use the portion of oil that is lit in order for it to burn faster. He also explains that Maimonides did not mention this case of wasting energy in his writing on Bal Tashchit because he may have found this case to be obvious and therefore implicitly included through mention of the other cases (water, clothing, etc). In addition, Rabbi Forehand argues that the wasting of oil occurs as a direct consequence of the person’s action (p. 348).
[3] Torah Lishma, section 76.
[4] Online at http://standby.lbl.gov/
[5] “Cleaner Air Brings Drop in Death Rate,” Nicholas Bakalar, The New York Times, 3-21-06, based on a study published in The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 3-15-06.
[6] http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs313/en/ Fact Sheet #313, August 2008.
[7] The two and a half year study was conducted in 2003 by a team from Israel’s Ministry of Environment, the Israeli Union for Environmental Defense, and the US Environmental Protection Agency. A summary of the study is available at http://www.adamteva.org.il/?CategoryID=424&ArticleID=391&SearchParam=air+pollution A related study, “Assessing the spatial and temporal variability of fine particulate matter components in Israeli, Jordanian, and Palestinian cities,” Atmospheric Environment 44 (2010) notes how urban air pollution is a significant contributor to the disease burden in the Middle East. Online at http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncer_abstracts/index.cfm/fuseaction/display.pubfulltext/publication_id/53977
[8] As reported in Miller Mcunne News, based on the study published in the Journal of Economic Psychology. The study was conducted by Tamir Levy of Netanya Academic College and Joseph Yagil of Haifa University. The study noted how days with poor air quality tend to negatively impact trading on the stock market. Article online at http://www.miller-mccune.com/business-economics/smoggy-days-make-for-sickly-stock-market-28076/
[9] Bava Batra 25a.
[10] Sefer Dinei Mamonot, 2nd chapter on damages, page 376, note 9, and elsewhere.
[11] For more on this topic, see the Jewcology resources on environmental damages.
[12] Mishna to Bava Batra 24b, and commentary of Rashi there.
[13] Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Bava Kama 82b, and commentary of Rashi there. Maimonides codifies this in Mishna Torah, Hilchot Beit Habechira, 7:14.
[14] Mishna Tamid 29a and Talmud p. 29b. Based on the statement of Rav Papa in the Talmud, this is the explanation of Rabeinu Gershom, Mefaresh, and one view cited by the Rosh.
[15] For more on the significance of the Temple’s incense, see the article by Baruch Hirchkopf in the Eitz Chaim Hee series, online at http://canfeinesharim.org/community/parshas.php?page=15747
[16] Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Yoma 39b
[17] “Air Quality in Israel: Now and Tomorrow,” “Israel Environment Bulletin,” vol. 33, March 2008, published by Israel Ministry of the Environment, online at http://www.sviva.gov.il/Enviroment/Static/Binaries/Articals/p0462_3-6_1.pdf
[18] However, from the perspective of Jewish law, the aforementioned laws do not apply to cities outside of Israel. See commentaries of Ramban, Ran, and Nimukei Yosef to Bava Batra 24b.
[19] Commentary to Exodus 35:2, citing Genesis 1:2, in Torah Commentary by Rabbi Bachya ben Asher, translated and annotated by Eliyahu Munk, Lamda Publishers, Brooklyn, NY, 2003
[20] Exodus 35:2, Judaica Press translation.
[21] Commentary to Exodus 35:3
[22] Commentary to Exodus 35:3
[23] The halakhic permissibility of using electricity on Shabbat is based on pikuach nefesh [saving a human life]: since we need electricity for emergency and security services, we can use it generally for other needs in a passive sense. For a 250-page exploration of Jewish law in relation to electrical appliances, including refrigerators, alarm systems, dishwashers, and elevators, see Shabbat and Electricity, by Rabbi L.Y. Halperin, compiled by Rabbi Dovid Oratz, Institute for Science and Halacha: Jerusalem, 1993.
A disagreement existed for many centuries between the Karaites and rabbinic Judaism starting in the eight century concerning whether can have fire burning on Shabbat. The Karaites understood the command ‘don’t kindle fire’ as ‘don’t use fire.’ The Rabbis saw the prohibition as not ‘lighting’ fire, and not about not using fire at all.
[24] For more on this theme, see the Jewcology dvar Torah on Shabbat, written by this author.
[25] http://www.worldwatch.org/pubs/goodstuff/lighting/
[26] Fossil fuels are also called hydrocarbons, because chemically they are long chains of carbon
[27] See the Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), online at www.ipcc.ch The data is detailed in the Synthesis Report from a gathering of 2,500 scientists and based on their research. For additional information refer to the US Climate Change Science Program Report Analyses of the Effects of Global Change on Human Health and Welfare and Human Systems See also the statement of Canfei Nesharim’s science and technology advisory board, online at http://canfeinesharim.org/learning/environmental.php?page=22256
[28] “Human contribution to more-intense precipitation extremes,” Min, S.-K. et al. Nature 470, 378-381 (2011). As reported in “Increased Flood Risk Linked to Global Warming, by Quirin Schiermeier, Nature News, 2.16.11, online at http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110216/full/470316a.html#B1
[29] See also “Perceptions of Climate Change,” James Hansen et. al, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, http://www.pnas.org/content/109/37/E2415.full.pdf+html
[30] “Hurricane Sandy Underscores Climate Change Threat to Coasts,” Union for Concerned Scientists, 10.30.2012 Online at http://www.ucsusa.org/news/press_release/hurricane-sandy-climate-change-coasts-0345.html The article notes, “Oceans have absorbed much more of the excess heat from global warming than land and scientists understand that when hurricanes form, higher water temperatures can energize them and make them more powerful. Warming is also causing the atmosphere to hold more moisture and concentrate precipitation in stronger storms, including hurricanes. In the case of Hurricane Sandy, it retained much of its strength as it tracked across ocean water that was 9 degrees (F) warmer than average for this time of year.”
[32] As quoted in Mind over matter : the Lubavitcher Rebbe on science, technology and medicine, by Rabbi Menahem Mendel Schneersohn, original Hebrew edition compiled by Joseph Ginsburg and Herman Branover; edited and translated into English by Arnie Gotfryd. Jerusalem: Shamir, 2003. p. 257. The talk, given in Yiddish and with English subtitles, is available online at www.chabad.org
[33] For more on this project see http://www.goodenergy.org.il/language/en-US/En/Projects/Project-Portfolio/Kol-Dudi-Solar-water-heaters.aspx
[34] According to United Nations statistics, 2011.
[35] Gemara Sanhedrin (get exact source)
[36] Isaiah 42:6 and elsewhere in the Book of Isaiah
[37] Radak, France, 1160-1235, commentary to Isaiah 42:6

 

Share this Post

 

Related Posts

About the author

 
The opinions and facts here are presented solely by the author. Torah Musings assumes no responsibility for them. Please address religious questions to your rabbi.
 

27 Responses

  1. Mr. Cohen says:

    I created this web site to help save energy:

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Why_Recycle_Aluminum/

    I invite everyone to join the web site shown above, and
    I invite all Torah Jews to join the web site shown below:

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DerechEmet/

  2. Mordechai says:

    I am okay with much of what this writer, and this series, talks about. However, I don’t like when he goes from clear and accepted things, like exhorting us not to waste (bal tashchis), keep the environment clean and try to minimize pollution, to things that are speculative and hotly debated, such as the parts of his piece that invoke the climate change and global warming theories above. I am disappointed to see this fine site give a platform to such things.

    According to the writer, hurricane Sandy came to due to ‘climate change’. Did that cause the great hurricane of 1938 that hit New York as well? As Rav Belsky shlit”a mentioned in the OU webcast the other day (app. seventy minutes into the event), we should introspect and examine if we have to do teshuvah, when we are hit with catastrophe, G-d forbid, as our tradition teaches. As the Rambam tells us, we should not ascribe such things to mikreh, as if they just ‘happened’ on their own, and that to do such is cruelty, אכזריות. Recently, the Governor of NY, the state which incurred the most damage from the storm, reacted angrily in a knee/jerk reaction when a Rabbi connected the storm hitting it to the immoral laws recently instituted there, pushed through by the chief executive’s arm twisting. Instead of admitting that he erred and invited Divine wrath upon NY, he blamed ‘climate change’. Similarly with the great drought across large portions of the US this past summer. On the other hand, in Tanach, the King of Nineveh took a strong stand and led his people to do teshuvah, repent, after they went ‘off the derech’, and thus saved them.

    Let us please hold back a bit and not automatically always jump on the bandwagon of the environmentalists, as parts of their platform are problematic, even if this Rabbi and others like him want us to accept it in its entirety, lock, stock, and barrel, without question. We need to take it slower and examine things in accordance with our tradition, and with guidance from our gedolim, rather than just accepting the whole left wing platform, after it has been given a thin Jewish veneer, which can be quite shallow.

  3. Nachum says:

    Silly Mordechai: *Everything* is caused by global warming:

    http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/warmlist.htm

    To put it simply, there is no evidence whatsoever that hurricanes are caused or exacerbated by “climate change.” There have been far worse hurricanes and hurricane seasons in the past few centuries. We live in an era where we think we are somehow special. Of course, ’twas always so: Kohelet says so.

  4. Rafi Miller says:

    Mordechai and Nachum: Rabbi Neril is appropriately cautious regarding the impacts of global warming on Hurricane Sandy. His more general argument, that anthropogenic global warming is a progressing disaster, is undeniable. Follow Rabbi Neril’s references on extreme heat waves, storms, floods, and drought. Intense human suffering due to global warming is already here.

    I find it tragic that so many American conservatives mock the threat of global warming. Their denial is empirically wrong and morally irresponsible. We urgently need to begin efforts toward mitigation and adaptation.

    Yishar koach to Rabbi Student for giving a platform to Rabbi Neril’s kiddush ha-Shem.

  5. Nachum says:

    “that anthropogenic global warming is a progressing disaster, is undeniable”

    It isn’t “undeniable” just because you say so. We’re not talking about the Holocaust here, much as people would like to say so.

    Here’s a random fact: In the times of the dinosaurs, the planet was a lot hotter than it is now or will be for some time in the future. (We are technically in an ice age now, and will probably be in what’s commonly called an “ice age” in the near future.) And life on Earth was *booming.* Have you ever seen a brontosaurus? They managed, somehow.

    Oh, and all those huge climate swings happened completely independently- there were no people around to have anything to do with it. And here people are panicked over computer models that *may* show a swing of a degree.

  6. Nachum says:

    “I find it tragic that so many American conservatives mock the threat of global warming.”

    Maybe if so many of the “solutions” weren’t so blatantly political (and useless), they’d be less suspicious of the Cassandras.

    “Their denial is empirically wrong”

    Again, on your say-so.

    “morally irresponsible.”

    Whose morals? Perhaps micromanaging people’s lives is immoral.

    “We urgently need to begin efforts toward mitigation and adaptation.”

    To paraphrase Fiddler on the Roof, if China and India would agree…

  7. Shalom Rosenfeld says:

    “The halakhic permissibility of using electricity on Shabbat is based on pikuach nefesh [saving a human life]: since we need electricity for emergency and security services, we can use it generally for other needs in a passive sense.”

    Um … can you clarify this please?

  8. Hirhurim says:

    Shalom: I understood him to mean that the Chazon Ish forbids benefiting at all from electricity on Shabbos in Israel because Jews work at the electric company. It isn’t about turning lights on but even using lights at all. Those who follow the Chazon Ish either have their own generator for Shabbos or hang kerosene lanterns in addition to the electric lights.

    Those who permit generally do so because the electric grid needs to be maintained for pikuach nefesh purposes. Once the grid needs to be maintained, anyone can benefit from it.

  9. IH says:

    I don’t understand the conservative backlash to this post. Even if it could be argued that humans are not the primary cause of empirical global climate change, human actions have been demonstrated to exacerbate the situation. So, being asked to be more responsible is, well, responsible leadership.

  10. Shalom Rosenfeld says:

    Thank you R’ Gil. Okay so it’s about in Israel, when the generators are being operated by Jews. (So what does it have to do with environmentalism or bal tashchis?)

    I’d heard someone distinguish between the manual generators of the 1950s and the automated ones of today?

  11. MJ says:

    As the Rambam tells us, we should not ascribe such things to mikreh, as if they just ‘happened’ on their own, and that to do such is cruelty, אכזריות.

    Rambam does not say (and it would go against his basic philosophy to claim)that such an event is not caused by entirely natural processes.

  12. Mordechai says:

    Thanks Nachum, I knew I could count on you to weigh in and provide some sanity here. :)

    Why doesn’t Rabbi Neri advocate that people get rid of their personal automobiles? Or is that set for a future post? If the threat is so serious and imminent, he should call for, at least as a ‘midat hassidut’, baalei nefesh immediately getting rid of gasoline powered vehicles, due to the many problems they leave in their wake.

  13. Mordechai says:

    Sorry, Rabbi Neril.

  14. Nachum says:

    It should also be pointed out that there’s very little, if any, actual melachah being done to maintain the system. No one’s shoveling coal into a furnace- and, in any event, the power is likely generated a few hours or a day earlier, which technically means you can’t use power on *Sunday*. But, again, considering that we’re talking about a bunch of people in front of computers *and* pikuach nefesh (you can’t produce power for, say, just hospitals and Iron Dome batteries), using electricity on Shabbat seems to me to be an easy one.

    IH, I am all in favor of being environmentally responsible. Contrary to myth, conservatives aren’t in favor of dirty water and air. We also like tigers. I also take pride that I live in a country (and lived in a country) that among the most responsible on Earth. It isn’t the West that’s the problem here; at the same time, the proposed suggestions of the Left will have no effect, as the Chinese government couldn’t care less. Apparently, being wealthy, modern, and religious can be pretty good for Mother Nature.

  15. IH says:

    the proposed suggestions of the Left will have no effect, as the Chinese government couldn’t care less

    So much for the concept of Or la’Goyim, then. Let’s just accept the worst of the world and leave it to God.

  16. Shlomo says:

    Contrary to myth, conservatives aren’t in favor of dirty water and air.

    Frequently they are opposed to preventing other people from dirtying water and air, which amounts to the same thing in practice.

  17. David Sher says:

    I think that this is a great post outlining the authentic Jewish view of things. I really cannot understand why this is a political discussion. Just because Global Climate change is mentioned? Even if it is a complete hoax (which science say it is not), there is no way of denying that using dirty energy is harmful to human life and therefore to be avoided by Jews. We are more than happy (figuratively) to spend the extra money on Kosher food, in order to respect the life of the animal involved but when it comes to energy are we ok using the cheapest and dirtiest form of fuel regardless of whether it causes a health issue for people?

  18. Mordechai says:

    David, let’s talk tachlis. It is easy to write in vague generalities, but talk is cheap. I want to know lemyaseh, about action, about specific deeds.

    How many cars do you/your family have? What kind? Are you ready to give it/them up?

    Will you have only two neiros this Shabbos instead of one per family member?

    What else are you doing to reduce the use of non renewable energy?

    Pardon the intrusive questioning, but with such an important inyan at hand, we need concrete actions, החלטות טובות, no?

    As the Lubavitchers say, hamayseh hu ha’ikar, the action is the main thing.

  19. Tal Benschar says:

    I want to know lemyaseh, about action, about specific deeds.

    I propose someone buy me a private jet, so I can fly all over the world and talk about global warming. Why should Al Gore have all the fun?

  20. Rafi Miller says:

    Nachum — it’s also the say-so of NASA, NOAA, AMS, NAS, AGU, ACS, and every other major scientific organization with an official position on the matter.

    It’s also the say-so of this review of recent research on extreme weather, which concludes:

    Many lines of evidence — statistical analysis of observed data, climate modelling and physical reasoning — strongly indicate that some types of extreme event, most notably heatwaves and precipitation extremes, will greatly increase in a warming climate and have already done so.

    In 1988, Jim Hansen famously stated in a congressional hearing that “it is time to stop waffling so much and say that the evidence is pretty strong that the greenhouse effect is here.” We conclude that now, more than 20 years later, the evidence is strong that anthropogenic, unprecedented heat and rainfall extremes are here — and are causing intense human suffering.

    History will render a clear judgement as to which of us is right, Mr. Nachum. I sincerely wish it would be you.

    As for the best course of action, my field is physics, not economics. David Frum made a strong argument for a carbon tax the other day, but I have no idea whether that’s the smartest way to reduce our carbon emissions. I just know that the problem is urgent.

    Best of luck.

  21. Mordechai says:

    The NY Times reported a few days ago (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/04/science/earth/after-hurricane-sandy-dunes-prove-they-blunt-storms.html?pagewanted=all), that something as simple as having high dunes at the shore greatly mitigated storm damage from Sandy.

    Places like Lido Beach, Atlantic Beach, and Westhampton Beach, NY, as well as Bradly Beach, NJ, which had such protective barriers between them and the water, escaped catastrophic damage, while places like Long Beach, NY, which refused to take part in a project for such a few years earlier, were devastated.

    Sometimes a simple solution can work. Going against nature by insisting on an artificial, level beach, as opposed to natural dunes, is not the way to go. I humbly suggest that people concerned about storms look into such simple, relatively inexpensive, and easy natural tactics, which return beaches to the natural state in which they existed in the past, something which is practical and more within reach (in addition to introspection, teshuvah, and davening of course), before trying to get the whole world to make drastic lifestyle changes, at great cost, which is not a simple or easy matter, if attainable at all (and assuming it would work).

  22. IH says:

    ” ‘Oh, that was easy,’ says Man, and for an encore goes on to prove that black is white and gets himself killed on the next zebra crossing.”

    - Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy

  23. Nachum says:

    Another thing that would make it easier to swallow would be if we didn’t know that the data was consciously fudged. “Hockey stick,” anyone?

  24. Nachum says:

    IH: So do you believe in God, then? :-)

  25. Rafi Miller says:

    Nachum — “consciously fudged”? You really believe that tens of thousands of climate scientists are in on a hoax? You should be careful with slander like that.

    If you’re still hung up on “climategate” from 2009, it might help to know that eight independent investigations of the incident found no misconduct by the involved scientists. And regardless of that, here’s how the AMS responded when the charges were first made:

    The beauty of science is that it depends on independent verification and replication as part of the process of confirming research results. … For climate change research, the body of research in the literature is very large and the dependence on any one set of research results to the comprehensive understanding of the climate system is very, very small. Even if some of the charges of improper behavior in this particular case turn out to be true — which is not yet clearly the case — the impact on the science of climate change would be very limited.

    A true conservative would never trade an entire field of science for a conspiracy theory. Especially with the climate of the planet at stake, we have a moral responsibility to take this threat seriously.

  26. emma says:

    its convenient how a short reference to climate change allows this thread to totally derail from the actual question of our consumption habits. whether or not there is climate change (i believe yes), and whether or not there is anything that can realistically be done about it by individuals (i believe probably not – the collective action problems are huge and international), there are other compelling reasons in this post for using less. i have been consistently surprised at how few comments these thoughtful posts garner. apparently this crowd just doesn’t know how to engage environmental issues except on a few pre-selected hot buttons?
    i’d be interested in r neril’s (or others’) thoughts on the following:
    lets say sea level is rising, and lets say that is going to mean lots of suffering for already-very-poor people in places like bangladesh. lets further say that no individual taking an extra-long shower vs. getting rid of their car will measurably impact that suffering. is there still something “wrong” with taking the long shower, knowing that it is part of the much-bigger-than-you process by which others are going to suffer? it seems to me there is at least a personal virtue in trying not to have a hand in the suffering of others. but that may be just an aesthetic reaction. thoughts?

 
 

Submit a Response

 

You must be logged in to submit a response.